SEO Workflows
Compare SEO Crawls
Compare two SEO crawls with SEO MCP to identify technical improvements, regressions, and release-related changes.
Crawl comparison is the clearest way to validate technical SEO work after a deployment. SEO MCP can compare two known crawl UIDs and help explain the deltas, but the conclusion should still be verified against affected records.
Comparison prompt
Compare the two latest completed crawls for [PROJECT].
Summarize:
- pages added or removed
- status-code changes
- on-page issue changes
- link and image changes
- score or overview movement
Separate improvements, regressions, and neutral changes.
For every major regression, retrieve representative records and explain
whether the pattern appears template-wide or isolated.Tool sequence
list_projectslist_crawlscompare_crawlsget_crawl_summaryfor each crawl when more context is neededlist_pages,list_links, orlist_imagesto verify an important delta
Choose comparable crawls
Comparison quality depends on scope. Confirm:
- The same project and domain.
- Similar crawl settings.
- Completed crawl status.
- Expected differences in URL limits or exclusions.
- Whether a release occurred between the two crawl times.
A large page-count change caused by a crawl limit is not a technical SEO regression.
Release review format
| Section | Include |
|---|---|
| Executive summary | One paragraph on net direction |
| Improvements | Measurable issue reductions |
| Regressions | New or expanded high-impact conditions |
| Expected changes | Intentional routes, redirects, or removals |
| Uncertain changes | Deltas requiring more evidence |
| Next actions | Owner, priority, and validation query |
Validate a regression
The comparison shows more non-2xx pages.
Use list_pages on both crawl UIDs with the same status filter.
Identify new affected URL patterns and return up to 20 examples.Keep the original crawl UIDs in the final report so another reviewer can reproduce the analysis.
Related documentation